뉴스

Financial Authorities Bring 'Extreme Volatility' Upon Themselves: What to Do with the 'Monster's Tail'?

Financial Authorities Bring 'Extreme Volatility' Upon Themselves: What to Do with the 'Monster's Tail'?

What Are the Negative Factors That Caused a Historic Stock Market Crash?

The Kospi, which had been celebrating after breaking through the 9,100 mark, plummeted by nearly 10% in a single day yesterday. Although retail investors stepped in to buy on the dip today, they failed to spark a V-shaped recovery as they had in the past. Concerns are growing that even the retail investors, who have long supported the domestic stock market, may have run out of steam. Yesterday's stock market crash is a shock that will go down in the history of the Korean stock market. The Kospi's decline of 9.99% was the fifth-largest in history, and the intraday gap between the high and low reached 971.61 points, setting a new record for the largest daily fluctuation. Multiple negative factors are being cited as the causes of this historic plunge. Combined with the limits of supply-demand concentration, these factors reportedly triggered a so-called 'chain reaction.'

① Side Effects of Semiconductor Concentration and Profit-Taking Sell-Off

The Kospi's recent climb past 9,100 was essentially a two-horse race led by the dual powerhouses of Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix. This has now backfired. News of large-scale fundraising by AI-related Big Tech companies in New York fueled anxiety. As doubts spread over whether these investments would yield sufficient returns, tech stocks on Wall Street plummeted, dealing a heavy blow to the twin engines of the Korean stock market. Foreign investors dumped massive volumes of large-cap semiconductor shares.

② Delay in SK Hynix ADR Listing Review

News that the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has once again delayed its review of SK Hynix's American Depositary Receipts (ADR) listing was another blow. As the event, which had been highly anticipated as a gateway for global capital inflows, became uncertain, disappointed global passive funds and hedge funds quickly pulled their money out.

③ Weakening Won (Surging Exchange Rate) and Fear of Foreign Exchange Losses

As tensions in the Strait of Hormuz escalated due to conflicts between the U.S. and Iran, demand for the U.S. dollar, a representative safe-haven asset, skyrocketed. With the trend of capital returning to the dollar already growing, the surging won-dollar exchange rate left foreign investors facing the double whammy of falling stock prices and potential foreign exchange losses.

④ Runaway Mechanical Sell-Offs via Program Trading

The failure to be included in the MSCI index, combined with the instability in Hormuz, maximized downward pressure through futures-and-options-linked program trading centered on large-cap stocks—a chronic weakness of the domestic market. Ultimately, when the index broke below key support levels, a flood of mechanical stop-loss orders was triggered.
Kospi crash

Single-Stock 2x Leverage ETFs: Growing into Stock Market Monsters

But is that all? Other Asian stock markets facing similar circumstances mostly limited their losses to the 2% to 3% range. Even though no new global economic shock had occurred, South Korea's market capitalization alone shrank by more than 700 trillion won in a single day. This indicates that the volatility of the domestic stock market has intensified, making it highly vulnerable to even minor shocks. The primary culprit is identified as the single-stock 2x leverage ETFs launched a month ago. Since their listing, these ETFs have rapidly grown into market monsters, characterized by extreme trading concentration and inflows of speculative capital.

① A 'Black Hole' Sucking in Capital

At the time of their listing in late May, the total net assets of the 16 listed products were relatively small, hovering around 200 billion to 300 billion won each. However, over the past month, they have acted like a 'black hole' for market liquidity. As of June 22, the total market capitalization of all 16 products reached 12.3 trillion won, roughly tripling since their debut. The pace of capital inflow has completely overwhelmed the early listing records of conventional index-based ETFs.

② Extreme Concentration of Trading Volume

Since the listing of single-stock leverage ETFs, cumulative trading volume has reached approximately 142.7 trillion won, with an average of 8.4 trillion won changing hands daily in this market. This accounts for a staggering 23% of the total ETF trading volume of approximately 622 trillion won during the same period. A severe market distortion has emerged, with just 16 single-stock leverage products monopolizing nearly a quarter of all ETF trading in the domestic stock market.

③ 'Tornado-Like' Daily Turnover Ratio

The Financial Supervisory Service (FSS) recently revealed that the daily turnover ratio of single-stock leverage ETFs averaged 122.5% up to June 12. This is more than four times higher than the 30.2% average turnover of domestic stock-based leverage and inverse ETFs, let alone the spot stock turnover of Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix, which stands at less than 1%. In extreme cases, the turnover ratio neared 200%. This means that short-term trading was so intense that the entire outstanding shares of these ETFs changed hands twice in a single day.
Single-stock leverage ETFs (exchange-traded funds) based on Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix were listed on May 27. The photo shows a screen displaying the Samsung Electronics single-stock leverage ETF being traded on that day. (Photo: Yonhap News)

Single-Stock Leverage ETFs Unleash Their Destructive Power

The rapidly grown monster fully demonstrated its power yesterday. In a plunging market, single-stock leverage ETFs did not merely track twice the return of their underlying assets; they acted as a 'downward pressure volatility amplifier' that accelerated the decline of Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix shares.

① Triggering a Deluge of Hedging Sell Orders from Liquidity Providers (LPs)

To guarantee a 2x return to investors, asset management companies and LPs operating leverage ETFs must hold the underlying stocks or related derivatives (such as futures). However, when stock prices plummet, LPs are forced to sell the underlying Samsung Electronics or SK Hynix shares and futures in the market to maintain the leverage debt ratio owed to investors. As the index crumbled and the stock prices of both companies plunged during yesterday's trading, single-stock leverage ETFs dumped massive program hedging sell orders to defend their asset value. This exacerbated the decline of the two large-cap stocks, creating a vicious cycle that dragged the Kospi index even deeper into the abyss.

② Late-Session Sell-Offs Driven by Daily Rebalancing

Leverage ETFs adjust their portfolios at the close of every trading day to match 'twice the daily return,' a process known as rebalancing. On days when stock prices crash throughout the session, like yesterday, these funds are structurally required to sell off massive amounts of underlying futures right before the market closes to maintain their leverage ratio. Indeed, it has been confirmed that a significant portion of the abnormal selling pressure on Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix near the closing call yesterday was driven by the mechanical rebalancing sales of these leverage ETFs.

③ Driving an Explosive Rise in the Fear Index

Because the market capitalization of these two underlying stocks is so dominant in the Kospi, the volatility triggered by their leverage products quickly infected the entire market. Yesterday, the Kospi 200 Volatility Index—often dubbed Korea's fear index—approached the 90 level to hit a yearly high. This serves as decisive proof that the explosion of large-cap volatility triggered by single-stock leverage ETFs paralyzed overall investor sentiment.

Analysts point to the recently introduced 'single-stock 2x leverage ETF'—a monster derivative product—as the key culprit that maximized the 'wag-the-dog' phenomenon, where the tail wags the dog, during yesterday's crash.
FSS Governor Lee Chan-jin

The Financial Supervisory Service's Belated Remedy

FSS Governor Lee Chan-jin had already foreseen this situation and issued a self-reflection at an uncanny moment. During a press conference on June 22, just a day before the stock market crash, he lamented, "I should have blocked the launch of these products, even if it meant lying down in protest." The Financial Services Commission (FSC) had originally rushed to approve these products under the pretext of "defending against a high exchange rate by redirecting domestic speculative demand away from the U.S. stock market and back to the local market." However, the result was akin to handing a heavy machine gun to a fragile domestic stock market. While the U.S. stock market is so massive that single-stock leverage products can hardly shake the underlying shares, Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix account for nearly half of the entire Kospi in South Korea. As speculative capital flooded into the 2x leverage products of these two stocks, a mere spasm in these products was enough to shake the entire Kospi.

Governor Lee's remarks, such as "I should have blocked it even if it meant lying down in protest" and "It only lined the pockets of brokerage firms with commission fees," paradoxically amount to an admission of policy misalignment within the government and a failure of preemptive risk control. This exposed the discord between the FSC, which pushed through the product launch, and the FSS, which failed to warn of the impending volatility explosion on the ground and only issued "belated warnings." As a result of the authorities opening the door to high-risk products without safety nets, the wild swings in the domestic stock market are spiraling out of control.

Today, the FSS hurriedly held a meeting with risk management executives from 10 major domestic brokerage firms, in cooperation with the Korea Financial Investment Association. The FSS urged brokerage firms not to limit themselves to superficial limit management, but to operate risk management systems that reflect market conditions and the need for investor protection. It emphasized that brokerages should refrain from business practices that lead to margin transactions without investors being fully informed, or practices that virtually induce margin trading. The regulator also ordered brokerages to clearly explain the conditions for forced liquidation (margin calls) and the potential scope of losses so that investors can easily understand them, and to strengthen their compliance with the duty to explain terms and conditions and product prospectuses. This is a classic case of neglecting the root to chase the branches, and prescribing medicine after the patient has died. Going forward, the financial authorities will likely be left to agonize over how to control the tail that is wagging the dog.
※ Please note: This article was translated by AI and may contain errors.
Copyright Ⓒ SBS & SBSi. All rights reserved.
Copying, redistribution, and unauthorized use in AI training are strictly prohibited.

Most Read