When citing or quoting this interview, please explicitly credit the program SBS "News Hunters."
Copyright belongs to SBS.
■ Broadcast: SBS "News Hunters" Monday–Friday (
18:50–19:50
)
■ Anchors: Kim Jong-won, Yoon Tae-jin
■ Guests: Nam Eon-ho (Legal counsel for the victim in the "Kim So-young Case"), Lee Kyung-min (Attorney)
--------------------------------------------
Kim So-young, put on trial on charges of serial motel murders, was sentenced to life imprisonment by a court of first instance, despite the prosecution seeking the death penalty. Kim immediately appealed the ruling, claiming that a life sentence was excessive.
The victim's family argues that Kim's crimes, committed not just once but as a series of murders, involved "definite intent." They maintain that a symbolic death sentence is necessary regardless of whether it is ultimately carried out.
Which side of the argument do you lean toward?
※ Full details are available in the video.
※
Copying, redistribution, and unauthorized use in AI training are strictly prohibited.